Advising Potential Recipients on the Use of Organs From Donors With Primary Central Nervous System Tumors | National Resource for Infection Control (NRIC)

Advising Potential Recipients on the Use of Organs From Donors With Primary Central Nervous System Tumors

Journal article
Abstract: 
Deciding to use an organ from a donor with a primary central nervous system (CNS) tumor necessitates offsetting the risk of tumor transmission with the chances of survival if the patient waits for another offer of a transplant. Published data vary in the quoted risk of tumor transmission. The authors used data obtained by reviewing 246 UK recipients of organs taken from donors with CNS tumors and found no evidence of a difference in overall patient mortality for recipients of a kidney, liver, or cardiothoracic organ, compared with recipients of organs from donors without a CNS tumor. Recent publication of the UK experience of transplanting organs from CNS tumor donors found no transmission in 448 recipients of organs from 177 donors with a primary CNS tumor (Watson et al., Am J Transplant 2010; 10: 1437). This 0% transmission rate is associated with an upper 95% confidence interval limit of 1.5%. Using a series of assumptions of risk, the authors compared the risks of dying as a result of the transmission of a primary brain tumor with the risks of dying if not transplanted. On this basis, the use of kidneys from a donor with a primary CNS tumor provides a further 8 years of life over someone who waited for a donor who did not have a primary CNS tumor, in addition to the life years gained by the transplant itself. The benefits for the recipients of livers and cardiothoracic organs were less, but there was no disadvantage in the impact on life expectancy.
Authors: 
WarrensAnthony N.BirchRhiannonCollettDavidDaraktchievMarenDarkJohn H.GaleaGeorgeGronowKatieNeubergerJamesHiltonDavidWhittleIan RWatsonChristopher J. Efor the Advisory Committee on the Safety of BloodTissues and OrgansUK Transplantation: 27 February 2012 - Volume 93 - Issue 4 - p 348–353
Category: 
Investigation
Prevention